LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Drug-related hospital admissions in older adults: comparison of the Naranjo algorithm and an adjusted version of the Kramer algorithm

Photo by andikausg from unsplash

To evaluate the ability of the adjusted Kramer algorithm in adjudicating causality of drug-related admissions (DRAs) in geriatric inpatients. The adjusted Kramer algorithm demonstrated a higher positive agreement with expert… Click to show full abstract

To evaluate the ability of the adjusted Kramer algorithm in adjudicating causality of drug-related admissions (DRAs) in geriatric inpatients. The adjusted Kramer algorithm demonstrated a higher positive agreement with expert consensus (100%; 95% CI, 93.0–100%) in assessing DRA causality in geriatric inpatients compared to the Naranjo algorithm (72.3%; 95% CI, 59.6–82.3%). The maximal positive agreement with the expert consensus and the pragmatic nature of the adjusted Kramer algorithm support the implementation of this causality adjudication tool as part of a structured, step-based DRA assessment approach in older adults. Drug-related admissions (DRAs) are an important cause of preventable harm in older adults. Multiple algorithms exist to assess causality of adverse drug reactions, including the Naranjo algorithm and an adjusted version of the Kramer algorithm. The performance of these tools in assessing DRA causality has not been robustly shown. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of the adjusted Kramer algorithm to adjudicate DRA causality in geriatric inpatients. DRAs were assessed in a convenience sample of patients admitted to the acute geriatric wards of an academic hospital. DRAs were identified by expert consensus and causality was evaluated using the Naranjo and the adjusted Kramer algorithms. Positive agreement with expert consensus was calculated for both algorithms. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore determinants for a DRA. A total of 218 geriatric inpatients was included of whom 65 (29.8%) experienced a DRA. Positive agreement was 72.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 59.6–82.3%) and 100% (95% CI, 93.0–100%) for the Naranjo and the adjusted Kramer algorithm, respectively. Diuretics were the main culprits and most DRAs were attributed to a fall (n = 18; 27.7%). A fall-related principal diagnosis was independently associated with a DRA (odds ratio 20.11; 95% CI, 5.60–72.24). The adjusted Kramer algorithm demonstrated a higher positive agreement with expert consensus in assessing DRA causality in geriatric inpatients compared to the Naranjo algorithm. Our results further support implementation of the adjusted Kramer algorithm as part of a standardized DRA assessment in older adults.

Keywords: kramer; adjusted kramer; kramer algorithm; naranjo algorithm; causality

Journal Title: European Geriatric Medicine
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.