LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Identifying Priorities to Improve the System of Care for Children with Complex Health Needs in North Carolina: Process and Outcomes of Systematic Stakeholder Engagement.

Photo from wikipedia

OBJECTIVE Children with complex health needs (CCHN) have both medical (e.g., chronic conditions) and health-related social needs (e.g., potentially adverse social determinants of health) that require ongoing healthcare and support… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE Children with complex health needs (CCHN) have both medical (e.g., chronic conditions) and health-related social needs (e.g., potentially adverse social determinants of health) that require ongoing healthcare and support from multiple community service providers. National standards developed for populations defined by health needs (CYSHCN) provide a framework for stakeholders to plan system-level improvements in care delivery for CCHN, but improvement efforts should reflect the priorities of their families and providers. This article describes a process of prioritizing system-level efforts to improve the health and well-being of CCHN and families in North Carolina (NC), using systematic stakeholder engagement and modified Delphi expert ratings. METHODS We surveyed stakeholders with experience caring for CCHN using an open-ended, 3-item instrument to identify opportunities to improve systems of care. Using directed qualitative content analysis, we synthesized responses into a master list of potential improvement topics. Using a modified Delphi approach, a 16-member advisory committee rated all topics for importance and urgency, on 9-point Likert scales over two rounds; then ratings for each topic were ranked (low, medium, high) to establish relative priority. RESULTS 47 individuals from 31 counties around NC provided survey responses, yielding 59 improvement topics in 10 domains. Through the modified Delphi method process, 21 topics (36%) received the highest rankings, largely representing access to community- and home-based services, equity, and enhancement of the pediatric workforce. CONCLUSIONS Priorities identified by stakeholders will inform advocacy, policy, and improvement efforts. Next steps for the coalition include developing improvement projects to implement stakeholder-recommended actions for the highest-priority topics.

Keywords: system; health; improvement; stakeholder; health needs; process

Journal Title: Academic pediatrics
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.