LAUSR

Objectives The hydraulic height control systems of hospital beds provide convenience and shock absorption. However, movements in a hydraulic bed may reduce the effectiveness of chest compressions. This study investigated the effects of hydraulic bed movement on chest compressions. Materials and methods Twenty‐eight participants were recruited for this study. All participants performed chest compressions for 2 min on a manikin and three surfaces: the floor (Day 1), a firm plywood bed (Day 2), and a hydraulic bed (Day 3). We considered 28 participants of Day 1 as control and each 28 participants of Day 2 and Day 3 as study subjects. The compression rates, depths, and good compression ratios (> 5‐cm compressions/all compressions) were compared between the three surfaces. Results When we compared the three surfaces, we did not detect a significant difference in the speed of chest compressions (p = 0.582). However, significantly lower values were observed on the hydraulic bed in terms of compression depth (p = 0.001) and the good compression ratio (p = 0.003) compared to floor compressions. When we compared the plywood and hydraulic beds, we did not detect significant differences in compression depth (p = 0.351) and the good compression ratio (p = 0.391). Conclusions These results indicate that the movements in our hydraulic bed were associated with a non‐statistically significant trend towards lower‐quality chest compressions.