LAUSR

BACKGROUND Competency-based education necessitates assessments that determine whether trainees have acquired specific competencies. The evidence on the ability of internal raters (staff surgeons) to provide accurate assessments is mixed; however, this has not yet been directly explored in the operating room. This study's objective is to compare the ratings given by internal raters vs an expert external rater (independent to the training process) in the operating room. METHODS Raters assessed general surgery residents during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for their technical and nontechnical performance. RESULTS Fifteen cases were observed. There was a moderately positive correlation (rs = .618, P = .014) for technical performance and a strong positive correlation (rs = .731, P = .002) for nontechnical performance. The internal raters were less stringent for technical (mean rank 3.33 vs 8.64, P = .007) and nontechnical (mean rank 3.83 vs 8.50, P = .01) performances. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence to help operationalize competency-based assessments.