LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Experimental comparison of abdominal drainage systems.

Photo by impulsq from unsplash

BACKGROUND In an experimental study the performance of different closed abdominal drainage systems was tested. METHODS A vacuum bottle designed for Redon Drainage, a flexible plastic bulb designed for Jackson-Pratt… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND In an experimental study the performance of different closed abdominal drainage systems was tested. METHODS A vacuum bottle designed for Redon Drainage, a flexible plastic bulb designed for Jackson-Pratt drains and a V.A.C.® Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System were used. In a porcine cadaveric study mimicking the abdominal cavity the intrinsic pressure (IP) at one and three minutes (T0, T3) and the amount of evacuated fluid were measured. RESULTS The Redon and Jackson drainage displayed a rapid decline to IP values of almost zero comparing T0 and T3. Only the V.A.C.® system was able to preserve constant values of negative IP values measured at both time points. Only the V.A.C.® system was able to remove almost the whole amount of inserted fluid. CONCLUSIONS In an experimental setting the V.A.C.® system was superior to the other two tested systems in delivering constant negative IP and the amount of evacuated fluid.

Keywords: drainage systems; system; experimental comparison; comparison abdominal; drainage; abdominal drainage

Journal Title: American journal of surgery
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.