BACKGROUND Non-operative management of early-stage polypectomy-identified colorectal cancer (CRC) may be a safe alternative, but limited data exist. METHODS We compared outcomes between adults with post-polypectomy CRC who did and… Click to show full abstract
BACKGROUND Non-operative management of early-stage polypectomy-identified colorectal cancer (CRC) may be a safe alternative, but limited data exist. METHODS We compared outcomes between adults with post-polypectomy CRC who did and did not ultimately undergo resection from 2003 to 2018. Overall (OS) and recurrence-free (RFS) survival were calculated via log rank analysis using the Mantel-Cox method and plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves with significance evaluated at P < 0.05. RESULTS N = 78 patients were included, most commonly with rectal/rectosigmoid CRC (45%). Almost half (47%) had resections, and the remaining 41 patients (53%) underwent organ-sparing techniques. Chemoradiation was administered to 5 of these 41 patients (12%), all with rectal cancer. At median follow-up of 52 months, 5-year OS and RFS were 78% and 100% with no significant differences when compared to resection (all P > 0.1). DISCUSSION Using evidence-based patient selection and adjuvant therapy, organ-sparing management provides equal survival when compared to resection for post-polypectomy CRC.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.