LAUSR

Since its inception, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has proliferated rapidly, eliciting debilitating ramifications for patients, physicians, and healthcare setups alike. Due to the exorbitant infectionrelated admissions, healthcare setups have been stretched to their horizons with a resultant depletion of essential resources. Consequently, time-sensitive decisions vouching for the prioritization of infected patients have been made, calling for unprecedented transformations in orthopedic surgical practice. Despite these significant reforms, novel guidelines surrounding the orthopedic surgical milieu remain at the epicenter of an elusive public healthcare conundrum. We hereby delineate these transformations and propose pragmatic strategies to mitigate the concomitant risks. COVID-19 has elicited widespread repercussions for the surgical specialties. Additional routes of viral entry come entrenched in procedures that necessitate physical contact. Considering this augmented risk of infection, triaging is key. Triaging requires assessing the level of urgency by using urgency scales [1]. Imperatively, the demographic and comorbidities of an individual form the crux of surgical decision-making [1]. Since body fluids act as a nidus for SARS-CoV-2 virions, surgical procedures must vie to reduce the production of aerosols. Orthopedic surgery draws heavily upon high-powered ammunition that generates exorbitant amounts of aerosols. To circumvent this, devices must be operated on the lowest energy setting feasible. Moreover, it is crucial that surgical wards encompass a laminar air flow ventilation system in order to expunge the aerosols. Orthopedic surgeons should stringently adhere to the prescribed personal protective equipment (PPE), including level 4 surgical gowns. Since orthopedic surgery is often laborious, powered air-purifying respirators can be employed in order to circumvent the risks inherent in using standard surgical masks that contain a permeable superior aspect for ventilation. The curation of negative-pressure anterooms can further reduce the risk of transmission. Furthermore, short, succinct procedures should gain precedence over the more complex ones in order to reduce the total operative time. The cytokine storm (CS) fomented by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains a hallmark of severe COVID-19 infection [2]. In elderly and diabetic patients who routinely constitute the demographic most vulnerable to osteoporosis and frailty fractures, COVID-19-induced prothrombotic states can be exacerbated by surgery and subsequent immobilization [3]. Interestingly, stay-at-home measures amidst the pandemic have resulted in an 85% reduction in high-energy fractures [4]. Nevertheless, low-energy fractures due to accidental falls still remain ubiquitous [4]. Furthermore, COVID-19 has been conjectured to adversely impact wound healing [5]. Additionally, in susceptible patients, COVID-19 can potentially spread through uncovered pressure ulcers [5]. The spectrum of urgency of orthopedic surgical procedures ranges from elective procedures to frailty fractures in the elderly. These categories can be divided broadly into mandatory in-patients, non-operative cases, single-day cases, and outpatient clinics. Mandatory in-patients, such as those requiring surgery for hip fractures, must receive expeditious intervention without any pre-operative delays. Contrarily, nonoperative cases, especially those with no risk of neurovascular compromise, can potentially be managed conservatively. Trauma clinics can be “virtualized,” with telemedicine playing a pivotal role in facilitating online consultations. Notably, stay-at-home measures have resulted in a significant reduction in high-energy fractures and consequent orthopedic referrals [6]. In its aftermath, a redundancy in the orthopedic staff responsibilities has ensued, paving the path for a novel Rota system that allows a senior clinician to be on the front-line at all times and thus optimizing patient management [6]. Risk stratification remains crucial in the orthopedic setting. Delineating what constitutes an emergent procedure depends not only on the procedure itself, but also on patient characteristics. For instance, a