RACTION AND IS reviewers extracted disagreements were discussion or thirder. Quality was both reviewers, using Assessment of ccuracy Studies and heterogeneity was I and c tests. Pooled ristics and 95%… Click to show full abstract
RACTION AND IS reviewers extracted disagreements were discussion or thirder. Quality was both reviewers, using Assessment of ccuracy Studies and heterogeneity was I and c tests. Pooled ristics and 95% ntervals were ith MetaDISC (version C, Madrid, Spain). A alysis of 5 studies, patients, was performed on studies ayed imaging, ECG ulse rate control were el plot asymmetry test estimate publication
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.