Abstract The accident occurred in Japan on 11 March 2011 has revived the interest for the analysis of severe accidents. The scarce and sometimes unreliable data concerning boundary conditions, effectiveness… Click to show full abstract
Abstract The accident occurred in Japan on 11 March 2011 has revived the interest for the analysis of severe accidents. The scarce and sometimes unreliable data concerning boundary conditions, effectiveness of accident management measures and equipment performance, pose a tough challenge in modelling the accident scenarios. Throughout an analysis of the challenges posed by the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 data recorded, this paper describes the major postulates proposed by CIEMAT concerning the equipment and component responses, the effectiveness of accident management actions and the MELCOR model applied. Among most influencing assumptions are those related to the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) leaking pathways and failure mode, the water flow rate entering the reactor, the potential leaking pathways and failure mode and location from the primary containment vessel (PCV) to the reactor building, the corium relocation from RPV to the cavity and its distribution in the PCV, the potential stratification of the suppression pool and the hypotheses made a priori concerning fission product release and transport. Based on the postulated scenario and model, a remarkable agreement of the thermal footprints in terms of RPV and PCV pressures during 500 h has been achieved, in which the RPV and PCV leaks/failures as well as venting played a determining role in the short run of the accident and water injection heavily conditioned the long one. As for the scarce data related to fission products (FP), a consistent agreement is found in the suppression chamber, but estimates in the Dry-Well are about an order of magnitude below measurements despite showing the observed trend. A number of factors might affect FP comparisons to data, from the approximate method to derive dose rates (measurements) from FP masses (MELCOR results) to the RPV and PCV postulated failures. Anyway, based on the data available the set of hypotheses and approximations made seem to make up a defensible scenario for Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1. The studies and results presented in this paper have been achieved under the frame of the OECD/BSAF projects through the CSN-CIEMAT collaboration agreement on severe accidents research.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.