LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Lessons Learned and Future Actions: Implementing a Stroke Specific Self-Management Program Research Study

Photo by _louisreed from unsplash

Research Objectives To highlight a research study investigating a stroke specific self-management program. We report the implementation process, lessons learned, and strategies developed in response to the barriers encountered. Design… Click to show full abstract

Research Objectives To highlight a research study investigating a stroke specific self-management program. We report the implementation process, lessons learned, and strategies developed in response to the barriers encountered. Design Hybrid effectiveness implementation trial. Setting Community. Participants Inclusion criteria: (1) acute stroke, (2) ≥ one chronic condition, (3) independent consent, (4) community dwelling at the start of the intervention, > 3 months post stroke, and (5) > 18 years old. Interventions Evidence-based self-management program, pre-adapted for stroke survivors. Six, 2-hour weekly group sessions on topics such as symptom management. Main Outcome Measures Information on lessons learned (barriers to implementation) and strategies to address the barrier, reported using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guidelines. Results 352 charts screened; 59 people met the inclusion criteria, 25 consented (42% of eligible sample) and five were interested in continuing at the 3-month call. We addressed barriers to implementation continuously. For example, before the group sessions began, the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated changes to the intervention delivery. We adapted the protocol to an online format, via a virtual platform. After making this change, we determined that almost all participants did not have computers or iPads, nor internet. Therefore, our strategy to remove this barrier was to deliver the intervention over the phone and we distributed the study materials via the mail. We classified this information in CFIR under Domain I, Intervention Characteristics and Construct D- Adaptability. Conclusions The CFIR was essential to reporting of barriers and strategies. Essentially, we decided to stop implementation due to poor participation and recruit additional participants. Future work will evaluate the strategies developed as well as report the clinical outcomes with the new cohort. Author(s) Disclosures No conflicts of interest.

Keywords: research; implementation; management; lessons learned; management program; self management

Journal Title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.