LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Values and cognitive mechanisms: Comparing the predictive factors of Australian meat intake

Photo by rayhennessy from unsplash

Recent studies have found values for animal-welfare, personal-health and the environment to be the main factors motivating veg*n diets. However, studies are yet to simultaneously compare these values between Australian… Click to show full abstract

Recent studies have found values for animal-welfare, personal-health and the environment to be the main factors motivating veg*n diets. However, studies are yet to simultaneously compare these values between Australian meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans, and therefore, the extent to which they motivate these groups. Further, while cognitive mechanisms (methods of reducing the psychological discomfort of eating meat while holding such values) have been found to facilitate meat intake, these mechanisms are yet to be compared against values in their ability to predict meat consumption. In the current study, meat-eaters reported the lowest concern for animal-welfare, personal-health, and the environment. With the exception of personal-health, vegans reported the greatest concern for these factors. However, cognitive mechanisms predicted meat consumption more strongly than these values. These findings may have implications for reducing meat consumption and improving outcomes for animal-welfare, public health and the environment.

Keywords: australian meat; animal welfare; cognitive mechanisms; meat; health; meat intake

Journal Title: Appetite
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.