OBJETIVES The neonatal line (NNL) in enamel is hypomineralized, but quantitative data on the enamel component volumes of the NNL are lacking. This study aimed at quantifying the variation in… Click to show full abstract
OBJETIVES The neonatal line (NNL) in enamel is hypomineralized, but quantitative data on the enamel component volumes of the NNL are lacking. This study aimed at quantifying the variation in the mineral, organic, and water volumes at the NNL and in pre- and postnatal enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS In buccal enamel longitudinal ground sections of exfoliated primary incisors (upper and lower; n = 17), the enamel component volumes were quantified at five histological sites (located at 40 μm intervals along a transversal line): the NNL, two sites in prenatal enamel, and two sites in postnatal enamel. Mineral volume was quantified using microradiography, and non-mineral volumes were quantified using polarizing microscopy. RESULTS Differences in component volumes between the NNL and pre- and postnatal enamel had high effect sizes (Hedge's G ranging from 0.89, for the water volume, to 1.88, for the mineral volume; power > 90 %). The distance from the NNL correlated with the normalized component volume: r = 0.459, 95 % CI = 0.274/0.612 (mineral); r = -0.504; 95 % CI= -0.328/-0.647 (organic), and r = -0.294; 95 % CI= -0.087/-0.476 (water). Approaching the NNL from postnatal enamel, the percentage differences in component volumes were: -1.93 to -3.22 % for the mineral volume, +21.26 to +35.42 % for the organic volume, and +3.86 to +6.03 % for the water volume. Towards postnatal enamel, the percentage differences had the opposite trend. CONCLUSIONS The enamel NNL is slightly hypomineralized with an increased organic volume one order of magnitude higher than the percentage differences in both mineral and water volumes.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.