LAUSR

Abstract Precedence relationships used in project planning mean for most professionals the traditional Start-to-Start-z (SSz), Finish-to-Start-z (FSz), Finish-to-Finish-z (FFz) and Start-to-Finish-z (SFz) relationships where z stands for the minimal necessary duration between the defined endpoints (Start or Finish) of the activities. These relationships have been serving professionals for more than 50 years, and there is not much visible effort for further developing them, despite some well-established critiques on the modeling capability of the Precedence Diagramming Method (PDM). The purpose of this research is: a) gathering those well-known and lesser-known developments of logical relationships that can be used for modeling some, so far, un-modelable problems b) classifying them by using a classification scheme that has been developed for this purpose and c) developing algorithms for time analysis when missing. The following earlier developments are discussed: maximal precedence relationships, point-to-point precedence relationships, continuous precedence relationships, relationships with AND/OR logical switches and bidirectional precedence relations. The classification shows that 24 types of logical relationships exist, but that algorithms exist only in four types, and are missing in twenty cases. The missing algorithms are provided here. The main contributions to the Body of Knowledge are: a) providing a classification scheme for precedence relationships b) definition of 24 precedence relationships based on the classification categories c) developing the missing time analysis algorithms for twenty cases d) presenting a single unified algorithm that handles all the 24 types of precedence relationships.