LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ACEI/ARB) are Associated with Improved Limb Salvage After Infrapopliteal Interventions for Critical Limb Ischemia.

Photo by _muratilik from unsplash

OBJECTIVE Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ACEI/ARB) reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, their effect on… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ACEI/ARB) reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, their effect on limb-specific outcomes is unclear. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of ACEI/ARB on patency and limb salvage in patients undergoing interventions for critical limb ischemia (CLI). METHODS Patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for CLI (Rutherford 4-6) between 06/2001-12/2014 were retrospectively identified. Primary Patency (PP), Secondary Patency (SP), Limb Salvage (LS), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 755 limbs in 611 patients (311 ACEI/ARB, 300 No ACEI/ARB) were identified. Hypertension (86% vs 70%, P<.001), diabetes (68% vs 55%, P=.001) and statin use (61% vs 45%, P<.001) were significantly greater in the ACEI/ARB group. Interventions were performed mostly for tissue loss (83% ACEI/ARB vs 84% No ACEI/ARB, P= .73). Comparing ACEI/ARB vs No ACEI/ARB, in femoropopliteal interventions, 60-month PP (54% vs 55%, P=.47), SP (76% vs 75%, P=.83) and LS (84% vs 87%, P=.36) were not significantly different. In infrapopliteal interventions, 60-month PP (45% vs 46%, P=.66) and SP (62% vs 75%, P=.96) were not significantly different. LS was significantly greater in ACEI/ARB (75%) as compared to No ACEI/ARB (61%) (P= .005). Cox regression identified diabetes (HR 2.4 (1.4-4.1), P=.002), ESRD (HR 3.5 (2.1-5.7), P<.001), hypertension (HR 0.4 (0.2-0.6), P<.001) and ACEI/ARB (HR 0.6 (0.4-0.9), P=.03) as factors independently associated with LS after infrapopliteal interventions. Freedom from MACE (ACEI/ARB 37% vs 32%, P=.82) and overall survival (ACEI/ARB 42% vs 35% No ACEI/ARB, P= .84) were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS ACEI/ARB are associated with improved limb salvage in CLI patients undergoing infrapopliteal interventions, but not after femoropopliteal interventions. ACEI/ARB had no impact on patency rates. They were also associated with a trend towards improved survival and freedom from MACE. Our findings suggest that the use of ACEI/ARB may improve outcomes in the high-risk CLI patient population.

Keywords: limb; acei arb; limb salvage; infrapopliteal interventions

Journal Title: Annals of vascular surgery
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.