LAUSR

HighlightsDelay activity in entopallium represents a neural correlate for the to‐be‐remembered visual stimuli.Delay activity in NCL represents a neural correlate for the upcoming reward.Both of these are regions are modulated by external factors and do not exclusively code visual or reward information. ABSTRACT We recorded neuronal activity from the nidopallium caudolaterale, the avian equivalent of mammalian prefrontal cortex, and the entopallium, the avian equivalent of the mammalian visual cortex, in four birds trained on a differential outcomes delayed matching‐to‐sample procedure in which one sample stimulus was followed by reward and the other was not. Despite similar incidence of reward‐specific and reward‐unspecific delay cell types across the two areas, overall entopallium delay activity occurred following both rewarded and non‐rewarded stimuli, whereas nidopallium caudolaterale delay activity tended to occur following the rewarded stimulus but not the non‐rewarded stimulus. These findings are consistent with the view that delay activity in entopallium represents a code of the sample stimulus whereas delay activity in nidopallium caudolaterale represents a code of the possibility of an upcoming reward. However, based on the types of delay cells encountered, cells in NCL also code the sample stimulus and cells in ENTO are influenced by reward. We conclude that both areas support the retention of information, but that the activity in each area is differentially modulated by factors such as reward and attentional mechanisms.