LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Change in arm position alters DC and AC components of photoplethysmogram signals

Photo by valentinantonini from unsplash

mixed effect analysis. Percentage of monitoring time in which each AR model was able to produce CPPopt recommendations were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. All patients were male with… Click to show full abstract

mixed effect analysis. Percentage of monitoring time in which each AR model was able to produce CPPopt recommendations were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. All patients were male with median age of 42 yr [interquartile range (IQR), 27e54]. The total monitoring time was 10 days with a median of 12.7 h per patient (IQR, 8.0e24.9). There was no statistically significant effect of types of AR models (PRx-DATACAR and LAx-DATACAR) on CPPopt recommendations [b-estimate1⁄40.117, 95% confidence interval (CI)1⁄4e0.303 to 0.531]. There was no statistically significant difference between the percentage of monitoring time in which CPPopt recommendations were produced by PRx-DATACAR and LAx-DATACAR (89.6% vs 87.8%, P1⁄40.463) (Fig. 2). PRx-DATACAR and LAx-DATACAR produced similar CPPopt recommendations throughout a similar percentage of monitoring time. Thus, PRx-DATACAR and LAx-DATACAR are as robust and could be used interchangeably.

Keywords: cppopt recommendations; lax datacar; datacar; datacar lax; prx datacar; monitoring time

Journal Title: British Journal of Anaesthesia
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.