LAUSR

INTRODUCTION The serial clinical failures of novel cognitive enhancer candidates point out the lack of predictive power in the preceding animal experimentation. For a more predictive profiling of putative procognitive drugs in rodents, we recently elaborated a methodical approach which consists of three fundamental steps: 1. teaching various learning tasks representing different cognitive domains to the same cohort of animals with the aim to create a population with 'widespread knowledge'. 2. Applying a cognitive deficit-inducing intervention to transform this cohort of animals to a 'patient population'. 3. Testing putative procognitive drugs with a 'clinical trial-like' design on the wide spectrum of cognitive (dys)functions in the actual 'patient population'. The present study has been the first trial to test the feasibility and utility of the proposed system. METHODS The population with 'widespread knowledge' consisted of 2 year old male Long-Evans rats with a learning history in five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT, attentional paradigm), Morris water maze (MWM, spatial learning), a cooperative task carried out in pairs (social learning), and a skill-learning task, "pot-jumping". For inducing cognitive deficit, thus creating a 'patient population' we increased the difficulty of the tasks. For the cognitive enhancer mechanism to test in the system we chose a serotonin 5-HT6 receptor antagonist compound, RO4368554. Animals were randomly assigned to vehicle- and drug treated groups based on their baseline learning performance and their response in a pilot test of increase in task difficulty. During the 13-day long treatment with 3 mg/kg ip. RO4368554 all the learning paradigms were repeatedly run with increased difficulty supplemented with a novel object recognition test (NOR, episodic memory). RESULTS In the 5-CSRTT, reducing the stimulus duration from 1 s to 0.25 s caused a significant decrease in the percentage of correct responses (from 52% to 31% in the control group) which was not affected by the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist treatment (correct responses decreased from 58% to 31%). In the MWM, replacing the escape platform to a new location did not mean a hard challenge for the rats. Members of both groups could find it within a relatively short time: mean escape latencies were 83 s and 65 s at the first replacement trial and 58 s and 74 s at the second one in the control and drug-treated groups, respectively. In the cooperation paradigm, where the rats had to perform simultaneous nose-pokes to get a reward, task difficulty was increased by requiring two consecutive simultaneous nose-poking from the animals. This caused a fall in the percentage of successful trials in both groups (from 48% to 12% and from 50% to 20% in the saline - and drug-treated group, respectively), however, by the end of the treatment RO4368554-treated animals showed significantly higher performance (29%) than saline treated rats (2%). The NOR test, carried out with a 5 -h delay, revealed poor recognition memory in both groups (discrimination index (DI) values were 0.13 and 0.06 for saline and RO4368554, respectively). Performance in the pot jumping test was also not improved by the drug-treatment. CONCLUSIONS The applied study design allowed parallel measurements of the action of the test compound on several cognitive functions and to follow its time course. RO4368554 did not show notable effects on impaired attention and visual recognition; nor did it affect spatial and procedural learning, but it exerted beneficial effect on cooperative behaviour. The revealed activity pattern highlight the cognitive domain most sensitive to the particular drug effect and may give hints for further target validating and clinical studies.