There have been concerns about overtreating the axilla in women with breast cancer at least since publication of the NSABP B04 randomized trial in 1977 [1]. This trial showed that… Click to show full abstract
There have been concerns about overtreating the axilla in women with breast cancer at least since publication of the NSABP B04 randomized trial in 1977 [1]. This trial showed that variations in locoregional treatment e including whether or not axillary lymph node dissection (AD) was performed in clinically node negative patients e had no influence on survival. NSABP B04 has had a major influence on surgical approaches the breast, and may be considered a precursor to trials, published in the succeeding decade [2,3], that established breast-conserving surgery (quadrantectomy, lumpectomy) as standard treatment for early breast cancer. As regards the axilla, although AD could be associated with significant morbidity (lymphedema, pain, nerve damage, etc.) moves to a more conservative surgical approach were hampered by the fact that axillary lymph node status was the most important predictor of long-term survival in breast cancer patients and hence an important guide to further treatment [4]. This problem can be considered to have been solved by the development of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) in the 1990s [5]. SNB is a minimallyinvasive procedure with fewer side effects than AD which
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.