LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A machine learning field calibration method for improving the performance of low-cost particle sensors

Photo by cokdewisnu from unsplash

Abstract Measurements of airborne particles in buildings with low-cost optical particle counters (OPCs) are often inaccurate and subject to uncertainties. This study introduces a methodology to improve the performance of… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Measurements of airborne particles in buildings with low-cost optical particle counters (OPCs) are often inaccurate and subject to uncertainties. This study introduces a methodology to improve the performance of low-cost OPCs in measuring indoor particles through machine learning. A two-month field measurement campaign was conducted in an occupied net-zero energy house. The studied OPCs (OPC–N2, Alphasense Ltd.) report size fractionated concentrations from 0.38 to 17.5 μm. Co-located reference instrumentation included a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS: 0.01–0.30 μm) and an optical particle sizer (OPS: 0.30–10 μm). The machine learning field calibration method applies Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and includes two components: (1.) correction of the size-resolved OPC counting efficiency from 0.38 to 10 μm and (2.) prediction of volume size distributions (mass proxy) below the 0.38 μm detection limit of the OPC. The field calibration method is applicable to OPCs that report size fractionated concentrations. In (1.), a GPR function was used to correct the size-resolved counting efficiency of the OPCs between 0.38 and 10 μm using the OPS as reference. In (2.), a second GPR function was used to predict the volume size distribution below 0.38 μm using the SMPS/OPS as reference. This was done given the significant contribution of sub-0.38 μm particles to volume concentrations in the accumulation mode. The machine learning field calibration method resulted in a significant improvement in the accuracy of size-integrated volume concentrations (PV2.5, PV10) reported by the OPCs as compared to the SMPS/OPS. Improvements were seen in the Pearson coefficient (before correction: 0.59–0.83; after correction: 0.98–0.99); coefficient of determination (before correction: 0.35–0.69; after correction: 0.97–0.98); and mean absolute percentage error (before correction: 35–69%; after correction: 19–25%).

Keywords: machine learning; calibration method; field calibration; field; correction; size

Journal Title: Building and Environment
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.