LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

“A Sure Thing” - Connecting Heart Failure Patients through the inpatient Heart Failure Navigator to the Outpatient Care Coordination Team: A Highly Successful Strategy to Reduce Readmissions

Photo by freestocks from unsplash

Introduction Heart Failure (HF) readmissions remain a critical issue for health care systems. HF Navigators (HFN) can streamline care transitions. Thus, we used an inpatient HFN to establish early follow… Click to show full abstract

Introduction Heart Failure (HF) readmissions remain a critical issue for health care systems. HF Navigators (HFN) can streamline care transitions. Thus, we used an inpatient HFN to establish early follow up and “hand off” HF pts to an OP Care Coordinator (CC). Methods At our hospital, HF pts can be admitted to multiple IP units. A HF Unit (HFU) primarily admits higher risk pts. A single HFN was recruited to staff the HFU M-F. The HFN linked HF pts to a CC to at discharge. Most HF pts were referred to the OP CC although some pts received only HFN services and no CC due to difficulty identifying HF pts prior to discharge. Over the 14-month period, the HFN established early follow-up and the CC made regular telephone contact post discharge. The incremental contributions of the HFN and CC were evaluated to test the independent impact of each of these roles based on the serial implementation of these roles in distinct hospital units and based on whether or not a particular HF pt was cared for by the HFN and/or the CC. Results Thirty (30) day readmission rates were measured for pts admitted between October 17, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Patients with a primary, discharge diagnosis of HF were analyzed. HFN services were provided on the dedicated HF unit (HFU) as part of a pilot program and were not available on other IP units during this period. Concurrent 30-day all-cause readmission data were stratified and reported based on admitting unit, involvement of the HFN with or without CC. Of the 757 pts (non LVAD or Transplant) who were admitted to units other than the HFU, there were 160 pts readmitted (21.1%). There were 254 high risk (Includes LVAD and transplant pts) HF pts admitted to the HFU, and there were 75 pts readmitted (29.5%) in this cohort. There were 33 (non LVAD or transplant) pts admitted to the HFU with care provided by HFN but who did not receive a referral to CC, and 6 pts were readmitted (18.9%). Finally, of the 169 HF pts were admitted to the HFU and had access to a HFN and CC, with only 9 pts readmitted (5.33%). Conclusions In this analysis, there was a synergistic effect noted to drastically reduce HF readmission rates when an IP HFN and OP CC were involved in the care of hospitalized HF pts. The 5.33% 30 day all cause readmission rates noted is significantly better than rates reported in the literature and reflects the critical role of combining HFN care with care coordination in the OP setting. These data have solidified an interest to expand access to HFN and CC to all IP units and can serve as a model for care delivery to improve readmission rates for this high-risk population.

Keywords: pts admitted; heart failure; care; failure; hfn

Journal Title: Journal of Cardiac Failure
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.