LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Pyrite in a sulfate-poor Paleoarchean basin was derived predominantly from elemental sulfur : Evidence from 3.2 Ga sediments in the Barberton Greenstone Belt, Kaapvaal Craton

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract Multiple sulfur isotope variability in Archean sedimentary rocks provides constraints on the composition of the Earth’s earliest atmosphere. The magnitude and sign of mass-independent anomalies reflect not only atmospheric… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Multiple sulfur isotope variability in Archean sedimentary rocks provides constraints on the composition of the Earth’s earliest atmosphere. The magnitude and sign of mass-independent anomalies reflect not only atmospheric processes, but also transformations due to the Archean marine sulfur cycle prior to preservation into sedimentary pyrite. The processes affecting the Archean marine sulfur cycle and the role of microbial or abiotic redox reactions during pyrite formation remain unclear. Here we combine iron (Fe) and multiple sulfur (S) isotope data in individual pyrite grains with petrographic information and a one-dimensional reactive transport model, to investigate the sources of Fe and S in pyrite formed in a Paleoarchean sedimentary basin. Pyrites were selected from mudstones, sandstones and chert obtained from a drill core in the ca. 3.2 Ga Mapepe and Mendon Formations of the Fig Tree and Onverwacht Groups, respectively, in the Barberton Greenstone Belt, Kaapvaal Craton, South Africa. Pyrite textures and δ 56 Fe distinguish early-diagenetic pyrite formed with pore-water ferrous iron (disseminated grains with average δ 56 Fe pyrite  = 0‰) from late-diagenetic pyrite formed through sulfidation of iron oxide minerals (layered and aggregate forms with average δ 56 Fe pyrite  = + 1‰). Mass dependent S isotope variability in pyrite was small (δ 34 S pyrite ranged from − 1.1 to + 3.3‰) with a correspondingly minor spread in Δ 33 S pyrite (ranging from + 0.3 to + 2.1‰) and Δ 36 S pyrite (ranging from − 3.08 to + 0.27‰) that indicates a lack of post-depositional re-working with other distinct sulfur sources. Our combined Fe and S isotope data are most readily explained with pyrite sulfide derived from microbial-reworking of solid elemental S. Iron oxide minerals were necessary to buffer sulfide concentrations and provide favorable conditions for microbial sulfur disproportionation to proceed. The lack of a negative Δ 33 S signal indicates that pyrite from relatively deep marine diagenetic environments only partially records the products of atmospheric photolysis, consistent with low sulfate concentrations in the Paleoarchean ocean.

Keywords: kaapvaal craton; greenstone belt; isotope; barberton greenstone; pyrite; belt kaapvaal

Journal Title: Chemical Geology
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.