LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Rurality, Stage-Stratified Use of Treatment Modalities and Survival of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND To eliminate them, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care and outcome disparities need to be better understood. RESEARCH QUESTION How does rurality interact with NSCLC care and outcome disparities?… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND To eliminate them, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) care and outcome disparities need to be better understood. RESEARCH QUESTION How does rurality interact with NSCLC care and outcome disparities? STUDY DESIGN and Methods: We examined guideline-concordant use of active treatment for NSCLC across 5 institutions in one community-based healthcare system spanning 44% of the Delta Regional Authority catchment area from 2011-2017. Institution- and patient-level rurality were based on Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Chi-squared, F-tests, and logistic regressions were used to analyze differences across institutions and rurality; survival was examined using log-rank tests and Cox regression. RESULTS Of 6,259 patients, 47% resided in rural areas; 2 of 5 institutions were rurally located and provided care for 20% of patients. Compared to rural residents at rural institutions, urban and rural residents attending urban institutions were more likely to receive stage-preferred treatment: odds ratio (OR) 1.68, [95% confidence interval (CI),1.44-1.96] and 1.33 [1.11-1.61] respectively, after adjusting for insurance, age, and clinical stage. Urban and rural residents attending urban institutions had a lower hazard of death compared to rural residents attending rural institutions: hazard ratio (HR) 0.69 [0.64-0.75] and 0.61 [0.55-0.67], respectively. Among recipients of stage-preferred treatment, care at urban institutions remained less hazardous: HR 0.7 [0.63-0.79]. When further stratified by stage, care for late-stage patients at urban institutions remained less hazardous: HR 0.8 [0.71-0.91]. INTERPRETATION Rurality-associated treatment and survival disparities were present at the patient- and institution-level, but the institution-level disparity was greater. Rural residents receiving care at urban institutions had similar outcomes as urban residents receiving care at urban hospitals. To overcome rurality-associated NSCLC survival disparity, interventions should preferentially target the institution level, including expanding access to higher-quality guideline-concordant care.

Keywords: rural residents; treatment; urban institutions; care; rurality; stage

Journal Title: Chest
Year Published: 2020

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.