LAUSR

OBJECTIVE The clinical presentation of pituitary dysfunction is typically variable and may often be insidious, resulting in delayed diagnosis by up to decades. The complexity of presentation and difficulty in pattern recognition of first line hormone tests result in challenges in early diagnosis of this condition. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of reflective testing and interpretive commenting on the early detection and management of such cases from primary care. METHODS Prospective audit over 12 months in which first line pituitary target organ hormones were identified via a reflex algorithm in the laboratory information system. Selected tests were reviewed by a laboratory clinician and decision made on reflective testing and interpretive commenting based on available clinical information and previous result trends. Patients who had a laboratory intervention were followed up to determine the clinical outcome. RESULTS Out of 1099 patients identified, additional testing was made for 214. Interpretative comments were subsequently added to reports of 196 patients, 48 (25%) of whom were referred to endocrinology and 35 (73%) of these were directly related to the laboratory intervention. Eleven other patients had outcomes related to the intervention. Pituitary related conditions (insufficiency and/or adenoma) were found in 29 patients, 24 of which were identified as a result of laboratory intervention. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the clinical value of laboratory intervention in aiding early detection of pituitary dysfunction and may avoid the disease burden of delayed management.