LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Removal of fixation construct could mitigate adjacent segment stress after lumbosacral fusion: A finite element analysis

Photo from wikipedia

Background data: Combined usage of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation has been extensively used to treat the various lumbar degenerative disc diseases. The transpedicular fixator aims to increase… Click to show full abstract

Background data: Combined usage of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transpedicular fixation has been extensively used to treat the various lumbar degenerative disc diseases. The transpedicular fixator aims to increase stability and enhance the fusion rate. However, how the fused disc and bridged vertebrae respectively affect adjacent‐segment diseases progression is not yet clear. Methods: Using a validated lumbosacral finite‐element model, three variations at the L4–L5 segment were analyzed: 1) moderate disc degeneration, 2) instrumented with a stand‐alone cage and pedicle screw fixators, and 3) with the cage only after fusion. The intersegmental angles, disc stresses, and facet loads were examined. Four motion tests, flexion, extension, bending, and twisting, were also simulated. Findings: The adjacent‐segment disease was more severe at the cephalic segment than the caudal segment. After solid fusion and fixation, the increase in intersegmental angles, disc stresses and facet loads of the adjacent segments were about 57.6%, 47.3%, and 59.6%, respectively. However, these changes were reduced to 30.1%, 22.7%, and 27.0% after removal of the fixators. This was attributed to the differences between the biomechanical characteristics of the fusion and fixation mechanisms. Interpretation: Fixation superimposes a stiffer constraint on the mobility of the bridged segment than fusion. The current study suggested that the removal of spinal fixators after complete fusion could decrease the stress at adjacent segments. Through a minimally invasive procedure, we could reduce secondary damage to the paraspinal structures while removing the fixators, which is of utmost concern to surgeons. HighlightsThe rigidity‐raising effect in instrumented segment induces adjacent segmental degeneration.The intersegmental angles, disc stress, and facet loads are higher in caudal segments.The compensations at adjacent segments could be decreased after removal of spinal fixators.Remove spinal fixators after fusion might mitigate the progression of adjacent segment disease.

Keywords: finite element; fixation; segment; fusion; adjacent segment

Journal Title: Clinical Biomechanics
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.