LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Headless compression screw for horizontal medial malleolus fractures

Photo by mehdouze from unsplash

Background: Horizontal medial malleolus fractures are caused by the application of rotational force through the ankle joint in several orientations. Multiple techniques are available for the fixation of medial malleolar… Click to show full abstract

Background: Horizontal medial malleolus fractures are caused by the application of rotational force through the ankle joint in several orientations. Multiple techniques are available for the fixation of medial malleolar fractures. Methods: Horizontal medial malleolus osteotomies were performed in eighteen synthetic distal tibiae and randomized into two fixation groups: 1) two parallel unicortical cancellous screws or 2) two Acutrak 2 headless compression screws. Specimens were subjected to offset axial tension loading. Frontal plane interfragmentary motion was monitored. Findings: The headless compression group (1699 (SD 947) N/mm) had significantly greater proximal‐distal stiffness than the unicortical group (668 (SD 298) N/mm), (P = 0.012). Similarly, the headless compression group (604 (SD 148) N/mm) had significantly greater medial‐lateral stiffness than the unicortical group (281 (SD 152) N/mm), (P < 0.001). The force at 2 mm of lateral displacement was significantly greater in the headless compression group (955 (SD 79) N) compared to the unicortical group (679 (SD 198) N), (P = 0.003). At 2 mm of distal displacement, the mean force was higher in the headless compression group (1037 (SD 122) N) compared to the unicortical group (729 (SD 229) N), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.131). Interpretation: A headless compression screw construct was significantly stiffer in both the proximal‐distal and medial‐lateral directions, indicating greater resistance to both axial and shear loading. Additionally, they had significantly greater load at clinical failure based on lateral displacement. The low‐profile design of the headless compression screw minimizes soft tissue irritation and reduces need for implant removal. HighlightsTwo constructs were tested for fixation of horizontal medial malleolus fractures.Headless compression screw and unicortical cancellous screw were compared.The headless compression screw construct had greater stiffness.Headless compression screws had greater load at 2 mm of lateral displacement.

Keywords: medial malleolus; compression; headless compression; group; compression screw; horizontal medial

Journal Title: Clinical Biomechanics
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.