LAUSR

Background: Postoperative alterations in cervical spine curvature (i.e. loss of lordotic angle) are frequently observed following total disc replacement surgery. However, it remains unclear whether such changes in lordotic angle are due to preoperative spinal deformities and/or prostheses design limitations. The objective of the study is to investigate strain and segmental biomechanics of the malaligned cervical spine following total disc replacement. Methods: Three disc prostheses were chosen, namely a metal‐on‐polyethylene, a metal‐on‐metal, and an elastomeric prosthesis, which feature different geometrical and material design characteristics. All discs were modelled and implanted into multi‐segmental cervical spine finite element model (C3‐C7) with normal, straight and kyphotic alignments. Comparative analyses were performed by using a hybrid protocol. Findings: The results indicated that as the spine loses lordotic alignment, the prosthesis with elastomeric core tends to produce significantly larger flexion range of motion (difference up to 6.1°) than metal‐on‐polyethylene and metal‐on‐metal prostheses. In contrast, when the treated spine had normal lordotic alignment, the range of motion behaviors of different prostheses are rather similar (difference within 1.9°). Large localized strains up to 84.8% were found with the elastomeric prosthesis, causing a collapsed anterior disc space under flexion loads. Interpretation: Changes in cervical spinal alignments could significantly affect the surgical‐level range of motion behaviors following disc arthroplasty; the in situ performance was largely dependent on the designs of the artificial disc devices in particular to the material properties.