LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Bone remodelling of the humerus after a resurfacing and a stemless shoulder arthroplasty

Photo by otto_norin from unsplash

Background: New implant designs, such as resurfacing and stemless implants, have been developed to improve the long‐term outcomes of the shoulder arthroplasty. However, it is not yet fully understood if… Click to show full abstract

Background: New implant designs, such as resurfacing and stemless implants, have been developed to improve the long‐term outcomes of the shoulder arthroplasty. However, it is not yet fully understood if their influence on the bone load distribution can compromise the long‐term stability of the implant due to bone mass changes. Using three‐dimensional finite element models, the aim of the present study was to analyse the bone remodelling process of the humerus after the introduction of resurfacing and stemless implants based on the Global C.A.P. and Sidus Stem‐Free designs, respectively. Methods: The 3D geometric model of the humerus was generated from the CT data of the Visible Human Project and the resurfacing and stemless implants were modelled in Solidworks. Considering a native humerus model, a humerus model with the resurfacing implant, and a humerus model with the stemless implant, three finite element models were developed in Abaqus. Bone remodelling simulations were performed considering healthy and poor bone quality conditions. The loading condition considered comprised 6 load cases of standard shoulder movements, including muscle and joint reaction forces estimated by a multibody model of the upper limb. Findings: The results showed similar levels of bone resorption for the resurfacing and stemless implants for common humeral regions. The regions underneath the head of the resurfacing implant, unique to this design, showed the largest bone loss. For both implants, bone resorption was more pronounced for the poor bone quality condition than for the healthy bone quality condition. Interpretation: The stemless implant lost less density at the fixation site, which might suggest that these implants may be better supported in the long‐term than the resurfacing implants. However, further investigation is necessary to allow definite recommendations.

Keywords: stemless implants; resurfacing stemless; bone remodelling; bone; model; humerus

Journal Title: Clinical Biomechanics
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.