LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Comparison of low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using low tube current technique and hybrid iterative reconstruction vs. filtered back projection.

Photo from wikipedia

INTRODUCTION We sought to validate whether low dose CACS CT with hybrid IR (HIR) could replace standard dose filtered back projection (FBP). METHOD We enrolled 100 patients to undergo low… Click to show full abstract

INTRODUCTION We sought to validate whether low dose CACS CT with hybrid IR (HIR) could replace standard dose filtered back projection (FBP). METHOD We enrolled 100 patients to undergo low dose CACS CT with HIR, in addition to routine full dose FBP. RESULTS No significant difference between full and low dose CT in Agatston score 138.2±360.6 vs. 137.3±356.4 (p=0.272) or calcium mass score 19±48.3 vs. 18.7±49 (p=0.8), respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed no systematic bias. Calcium volume difference was statistically significant 57.2±134 vs. 55.1±130.2 (p=0.001). CONCLUSION Low dose CT for calcium scoring with HIR enables stable CACS Agatston score and calcium mass quantification as compared to full dose FBP.

Keywords: low dose; calcium scoring; back projection; filtered back; calcium

Journal Title: Clinical imaging
Year Published: 2017

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.