LAUSR

OBJECTIVE Angulated projections are used in radiography to show the cervical neural foramen. Imaging the coronal oblique planes in an MRI of the cervical spine should therefore improve visualization of neural foramen pathology. This has to be demonstrated. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multi-center investigation of 40 patients with monoradiculopathy and 10 healthy controls was undertaken. T2-weighted sagittal, coronal oblique and axial slices were individually and separately examined by four readers blinded to the diagnosis. The statistical evaluation compared against the clinical gold standard of the neurological diagnosis of a single nerve root irritation or lesion. RESULTS The sensitivity/specificity required to detect the relevant neural foramen pathology was 0.47/0.60 for axial, 0.57/0.90 for sagittal and 0.55/0.70 for coronal oblique scans. The readers felt significantly more confident in attributing the cause of pathology using coronal oblique planes. Interreader reliability was moderate to substantial, with the highest values for the sagittal planes (0.39-0.76) and lower values for the transversal and coronal oblique planes (0.15-0.63). Intrareader reliability was substantial, with values between 0.53 and 0.88. Reading the axial planes was significantly more time consuming than reading the other planes. CONCLUSION The use of coronal oblique planes in cervical spine MRIs increases sensitivity and confidence in attributing the cause of neural foramen obstruction. They are easy to interpret and demand less reading time than axial planes, and so the inclusion of coronal oblique planes in the workup of cervical spine MRI is recommended, at least when neural foramen pathology is suspected.