LAUSR

OBJECTIVE The influence of the TMS-parameters on the efficacy and reliability to induce diaphragmatic motor-evoked potentials (diMEPs) has not been studied so far. Therefore, the objective of the present research is to probe the role of TMS- waveform (monophasic- [Mo] vs. biphasic-pulses [Bi]) and current direction (posterior-anterior [Pa] vs. anterior-posterior [Ap]) in the activation of the diaphragm. METHODS Four different pulse-configurations (Mo-Ap, Mo-Pa, Bi-Ap, Bi-Pa) were applied by means of neuronavigated-TMS and surface MEP-recordings at relaxed end-expiration in 19 healthy subjects. The parameters resting motor threshold (RMT), diMEP-amplitude and -latency, as well as best stimulation site (motor hotspot) and central motor conduction time were studied. Diaphragm movements were simultaneously recorded via ultrasound. To control for possible signal contamination the MEPs of muscles neighboring the diaphragm were also obtained. RESULTS The motor hotspots of the diaphragm showed similar spatial distribution for the Mo-Ap, Mo-Pa, Bi-Ap and Bi-Pa. The biphasic-pulses yielded significantly lower RMTs and higher diMEP-amplitudes as the monophasic-pulses. Anterior to posterior oriented Bi- and Mo-pulses evoked significantly shorter diMEP-latencies than the posterior-anterior oriented ones. CONCLUSIONS The present research demonstrates that biphasic- as compared to monophasic-pulses require significantly less charge and time for inducing diMEPs. SIGNIFICANCE The biphasic-TMS is best suited for the demanding stimulation of the diaphragm.