LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

A novel in-hospital meal service improves protein and energy intake.

Photo from wikipedia

BACKGROUND & AIMS Improvement of hospital meal services is a strategy to optimize protein and energy intake and prevent or treat malnutrition during hospitalization. FoodforCare (FfC) is a new concept… Click to show full abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS Improvement of hospital meal services is a strategy to optimize protein and energy intake and prevent or treat malnutrition during hospitalization. FoodforCare (FfC) is a new concept comprising 6-protein-rich meals per day, provided directly at the bedside following proactive advice from a nutritional assistant. Our aim is to investigate whether this new concept, FfC, improves dietary intake and patient satisfaction, compared to the traditional 3-meals a day service (TMS). METHODS We performed a quasi experimental study at medical (Gastroenterology) and surgical (Gynecology, Urology, Orthopedics) wards. Patients were offered TMS (July 2015-May 2016; n = 326) or FfC meal service (after stepwise introduction per ward from January 2016-December 2016; n = 311). Primary outcome was the mean percentage of protein and energy intake relative to requirements, between patients receiving TMS and those receiving FfC, on the first and fourth day of full oral intake. Patient satisfaction comprised rating of the experienced quality of the meals and the meal service by means of a validated questionnaire. RESULTS Patient characteristics were similar between groups, with the exception that the FfC group contained more oncology patients (p = 0.028). FfC improved mean daily protein intake (in g/day) relative to requirements (1.2 g/kg/day) at day 1 (mean % ±SD: 79 ± 33 vs. 59 ± 28; p < 0.05) and day 4 (73 ± 38 vs. 59 ± 29; p < 0.05). Mean daily energy intake (in kcal/day) relative to requirements improved at day 1 (88 ± 34 vs. 70 ± 30; p < 0.05) and day 4 (84 ± 40 vs. 73 ± 31; p = 0.05). On a scale of 1-10, patient satisfaction remained unchanged, in terms of food quality (7.7 ± 1.5 vs. 7.4 ± 1.4; p = 0.09) and meal service (7.8 ± 1.3 vs. 7.7 ± 1.1; p = 0.29). The FfC group was more satisfied with the appearance and smell of the meals (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of this novel meal service substantially improved protein and energy intake while maintaining, and to some extent, improving patient satisfaction. REGISTRATION NO NCT03195283.

Keywords: day; meal service; service; energy intake

Journal Title: Clinical nutrition
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.