LAUSR

OBJECTIVES To measure the agreement between women's current contraceptive use and her preferred method, as well as her partner's preferred method. STUDY DESIGN We used the fourth wave of survey data (2017-18) from the Umoyo wa Thanzi (UTHA) cohort study of sexual and reproductive health decision making. The prevalence of concordance between women's current method and her preferred method was calculated (n=818). Among partnered women, we calculated prevalence of concordance between women's current method and her partner's preferred method (n=719). We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between women's characteristics and the outcomes. RESULTS Despite high prevalence of modern contraceptive use (74.4%), many women were using methods that did not match their preferences (62.6%) or those of their partners (62.3%). Fifty-five percent of women with preference-use discordance preferred methods that were more effective than theirs. Satisfaction with current family planning choice (aOR, > 5.5 each) and pregnancy desires (aOR, >1.5 each) were strong predictors of both concordance between women's current method and her preferred method and her partner's preferred method. Women who reported higher sexual frequency in past month had elevated odds of concordance between her current and preferred method (aOR: 1.97 for 9+times in past months) than women who had not had sex. CONCLUSIONS Many Malawian women are not using methods they or their partners prefer. Women desiring pregnancy, women reporting infrequent sex, and women who are not satisfied with their method are likely to prefer a different method than the one they are currently using. IMPLICATIONS Understanding women's preferences can assist with family planning service provision. Health care providers and research should consider the specific methods that women and their partners prefer to use, besides whether they are using any method.