LAUSR

For almost 20 years, therapeutic hypothermia has been a cornerstone of modern post-cardiac arrest care lowering mortality and improving neurological compared to conventional therapy. This was challenged by the first TTM-trial in 2013, which did not show a benefit for hypothermia at 33°C compared to controlled normothermia at 36°C. Now, the TTM2 trial showed no benefit of hypothermia for compared to fever prevention alone. While TTM1 and TTM2 suggest that hypothermia might not be helpful, a deep dive into the trials reveals that this conclusion does not hold true. Here, we focus on patient selection, suboptimal application of hypothermia, interaction of standard sedation with hypothermia, high incidence of post-arrest fever, and withdrawal of life support based on per-protocol neurological prognostication in the TTM2-trial. Of particular interest, contemporary trials and registries using intravascular cooling in TTM-like patients repeatedly reported much lower mortality rates than those described in both TTM1 and TTM2.