AIM To investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the differentiation of sinonasal small round cell malignant tumours (SRCMTs) from non-SRCMTs and to compare and correlate these results… Click to show full abstract
AIM To investigate the value of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in the differentiation of sinonasal small round cell malignant tumours (SRCMTs) from non-SRCMTs and to compare and correlate these results with those of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients with histologically confirmed sinonasal malignant tumours (53 SRCMTs and 37 non-SRCMTs) who underwent conventional MRI, IVIM, and DCE-MRI before treatment were enrolled. The IVIM and DCE-MRI parameters were measured. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, and Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS A lower pure diffusion coefficient (D) value and a higher pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) value were found in the sinonasal SRCMTs than in the non-SRCMTs (p<0.001 and p=0.011, respectively). Moreover, the mean extravascular extracellular space volume ratio (Ve) of the SRCMTs was significantly lower than that of the non-SRCMTs (p=0.020). ROC curve analysis showed that the diagnostic performance of D outperformed those of the other perfusion and diffusion parameters. A cut-off D value of 0.56 ×10-3 mm2/s yielded a sensitivity of 80.4%, a specificity of 75%, and an accuracy of 78.2%, with an AUC of 0.825. Significant but poor-to-fair correlations were found between the parameters from IVIM and DCE-MRI. CONCLUSIONS The D and D* values of IVIM and the Ve value of DCE-MRI are helpful in distinguishing sinonasal SRCMTs from non-SRCMTs, with the D values having the best diagnostic efficiency.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.