LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Early preterm infants with abnormal psychomotor neurodevelopmental outcome at age two show alterations in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography signals.

Photo from wikipedia

INTRODUCTION Recent studies showed that neurodevelopment in preterm infants can be predicted by using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG)-derived parameters. In our previous study we demonstrated that aEEG could be useful in… Click to show full abstract

INTRODUCTION Recent studies showed that neurodevelopment in preterm infants can be predicted by using amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG)-derived parameters. In our previous study we demonstrated that aEEG could be useful in predicting neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm infants at the corrected age of 2 years. AIM The aim of this study was to further evaluate aEEG for predicting neurodevelopmental outcome at the at the corrected age of 2 years in preterm infants. METHODS Between July 2010 and June 2016 440 very preterm infants were eligible for the study at Innsbruck Medical University Hospital. The aEEG was evaluated for the Burdjalov score in 306 preterm infants (mean gestational age 29.5 weeks; range: 24.1-31.9 weeks). At the corrected age of 2 years outcome was assessed by the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. RESULTS The cohort was divided into three subgroups: 248 infants with normal outcome, 40 infants with delayed outcome and 18 infants with abnormal outcome. Burdjalov scores were lower in infants with delayed outcome than in infants with normal outcome and even lower in infants with abnormal outcome. Post-hoc analysis showed significant differences between normal and delayed psychomotor outcome at 18-24 h (5 (3;6) versus 3 (3;5), p = .024), 30-36 h (6 (4;8) versus 4 (4;6), p = .033), 42-48 h (7 (5;8.5) versus 4 (4;7), p = .003), 54-60 h (7 (6;9) versus 5 (4;7), p = .003), 66-72 h (8 (6;9) versus 6.5 (4.25;7.75), p = .027) and week one (8 (7;10) versus 6.5 (5;8), p = .021). Additionally, when comparing normal to abnormal outcome, a significant difference was found at week four (12 (9;12) versus 8 (7;10), p = .024). The Burdjalov score was only predictive for a delayed psychomotor outcome, presenting the highest area under the curve (0.690) at week two of life. CONCLUSION We observed differences in aEEG signals and neurodevelopmental outcome at the corrected age of 2 years, especially for psychomotor outcome. The predictive value of the Burdjalov score regarding neurodevelopmental outcome at the corrected age of 2 years in preterm infants was low.

Keywords: neurodevelopmental outcome; age; corrected age; versus; preterm infants

Journal Title: Early human development
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.