LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Geometric characteristics and optical performance of ACPCs for integration with roofing structure of buildings

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract Stationary compound parabolic concentrators (CPC) are usually oriented in the east–west direction and tilted towards the equator for efficient radiation concentration. However, the slope ( β ) of roofing… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Stationary compound parabolic concentrators (CPC) are usually oriented in the east–west direction and tilted towards the equator for efficient radiation concentration. However, the slope ( β ) of roofing structure integrated with CPCs may be not equal to site latitude ( λ ) in buildings, thus asymmetric CPCs (ACPC) should be used. In this work, geometric characteristics and optical performance of ACPCs integrated onto roofs of buildings are investigated. To perform this work, a mathematical procedure, in which three and four reflections within ACPCs with flat-plate (ACPC-1) and tubular (ACPC-2) absorbers are respectively considered, is suggested and validated by ray-tracing analysis. Analysis shows that the geometric concentration of ACPCs on a south-facing roof tilted at an angle ( α = λ - β ) relative to the site latitude is not only dependent on angular extent (2 θ a ) of solar rays required for acceptance on the cross-section of linear ACPCs, but also dependent on the geometry of absorbers and α . Calculation results indicate that given θ a , the geometric concentration ratio ( C t ) of horizontally truncated ACPC-1 decreases with an increase of α but that of ACPC-2 increases. Compared to similar symmetric CPC, an appropriately designed ACPC not only reduce the use of reflector materials but also increase the annual collectible radiation ( S a ). It is found that as compared to similar symmetric CPC, for ACPC-1 with θ a = 35 .5° and ρ = 0 . 9 , 7° and 10° of | a | result in reduction of S a less than 1%, and 2%, respectively; whereas for ACPC-2, 10° and 15° of | a | result in reduction of S a less than 1%, and 2%, respectively.

Keywords: geometric characteristics; optical performance; characteristics optical; roofing structure; acpc; acpcs

Journal Title: Energy Reports
Year Published: 2021

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.