LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

138. Toward adaptive radiotherapy: Morphological and setup variability in head and neck TomoTherapy treatments

Photo from wikipedia

Abstract Purpose In head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy, an essential requirement is the reproducibility of the relative position of head and neck during the whole treatment. Moreover, adaptive radiotherapy for… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Purpose In head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy, an essential requirement is the reproducibility of the relative position of head and neck during the whole treatment. Moreover, adaptive radiotherapy for H&N cancer would benefit from indicators capable of easily identifying morphological alterations. Aim of this study was to test whether the immobilization device guarantees a reproducible head and neck position and to identify, on set-up verification images, some indicators capable of describing morphological alterations. Methods and materials A retrospective analysis on 15 patients immobilized using s-shaped head-neck-shoulders masks and treated with TomoTherapy (50–70 Gy/25-33fr) was conducted. For each treatment session two MVCT-CT registrations were performed alternatively optimizing matching on the head or the neck. For each patient mean differences between the two registrations parameters ( Δ x, Δ y, Δ z, Δ pitch, Δ roll, Δ yaw) over all treatment sessions were evaluated. Morphological alterations were studied (once a week for the whole treatment duration) by measuring on MVCT images the skin-to-skin distance at 3 different antero-posterior levels: at the center of parotid glands (line1) and 2 cm (line 2) and 4 cm (line 3) anteriorly. Mean percentage variations respect to the first week were evaluated for all patients. A Student’s t-test was carried out (p  Results Mean differences between head and neck registration parameters are reported in Table 1 . Except for two patients, mean differences were smaller than 1.7 mm and 1.2°. Mean percentage variations of lines’ length are reported in Fig. 1. For all, a decreasing trend was observed. Variations are statistically significant starting from the 4 th week for lines 1 and 2, and only from the 6 th week for line 3. Conclusion The immobilization device enables adequate H&N set-up during the whole treatment for almost all patients. Lines 1 and 2 drawn on MVCT images seem to be suitable for describing morphological alterations that might deserve re-planning.

Keywords: head; adaptive radiotherapy; treatment; head neck

Journal Title: Physica Medica
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.