LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Critical comparison of shake‐flask, potentiometric and chromatographic methods for lipophilicity evaluation (log Po/w) of neutral, acidic, basic, amphoteric, and zwitterionic drugs

Photo from wikipedia

&NA; In the present study three different procedures have been compared for the determination of the lipophilicity of the unionized species (log Po/w) of neutral, acidic, basic, amphoteric, and zwitterionic… Click to show full abstract

&NA; In the present study three different procedures have been compared for the determination of the lipophilicity of the unionized species (log Po/w) of neutral, acidic, basic, amphoteric, and zwitterionic drugs. Shake‐flask, potentiometric and chromatographic approaches have been assayed in a set of 66 representative compounds in different phases of advanced development. An excellent equivalence has been found between log Po/w values obtained by shake‐flask and potentiometry, while the chromatographic approach is less accurate but very convenient for screening purposes when a high‐throughput is required. In the case of zwitterionic and amphoteric compounds, either for shake‐flask and chromatographic methods, the pH has to be accurately selected in order to ensure the compound to be in its neutral form. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

Keywords: amphoteric zwitterionic; acidic basic; basic amphoteric; log neutral; neutral acidic; shake flask

Journal Title: European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.