OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to compare yttrium -90 (90Y) dosimetry obtained from pre-therapy 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT versus post-therapy PET/MRI imaging among patients with primary or metastatic… Click to show full abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to compare yttrium -90 (90Y) dosimetry obtained from pre-therapy 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT versus post-therapy PET/MRI imaging among patients with primary or metastatic hepatic tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prior to 90Y radioembolization (RE), 32 patients underwent a scan using MAA mimicking 90Y distribution. After RE with 90Y microspheres, the patients were imaged on a PET/MRI system. Reconstructed images were transferred to a common platform and used to calculate 90Y dosimetry. The Passing-Bablok regression scatter diagram and the Bland and Altman method were used to analyze the difference between dosimetry values. RESULTS For MAA and PET/MRI modalities, the mean liver doses for all 32 subjects were 43.0 ± 20.9 Gy and 46.5 ± 22.7 Gy, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.4 ± 6.2 Gy. The repeatibility coefficient was 12.1 (27.0% of the mean). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was high (ρ = 0.92). Although, there was a substantial difference in the maximum doses to the liver between the modalities, the mean liver doses were relatively close, with a difference of 24.0% or less. CONCLUSIONS The two main contributors to the difference between dosimetry calculations using MAA versus 90Y PET/MRI can be attributed to the changes in catheter positioning as well as the liver ROIs used for the calculations. In spite of these differences, our results demonstrate that the dosimetry values obtained from pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT scans and PET/MRI post-therapy 90Y studies were not significantly different.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.