LAUSR

PURPOSE To evaluate image quality (IQ) and radiation dose in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system. METHOD We examined 16 cadaveric ankles with standard-dose (FD) and low-dose (LD) protocols using the new system's CBCT mode. For comparison, we performed multi-slice CT imaging (MSCT) with a clinical protocol. Three radiologists assessed IQ, noise and artifacts in bone and soft tissue on a five-point Likert scale (1= poor IQ; strong noise or artifacts; 5= excellent IQ; minimal noise or artifacts). Volume CT dose indices (CTDIvol) were calculated for radiation dose comparison between CBCT and MSCT. RESULTS Overall IQ was described as very good or excellent by reader 1/2/3 in 62.5/87.5/56.3% of LD, 87.5/87.5/81.3% of FD and 100/87.5/87.5% of MSCT studies. Readers agreed that IQ was better in MSCT than LD (R1/R2/R3; p ≤ 0.008), two also found advantages of MSCT over FD (R1/R3; p ≤ 0.034). Soft tissue noise and artifacts were stronger in FD (all p ≤ 0.002) and LD (all p ≤ 0.001). In bone, artifacts and noise were also more severe in LD (all p < 0.001) and FD (all p ≤ 0.003). CTDIvol for clinical MSCT scans without dose modulation (15.0 ± 0.0 mGy) were higher than for FD (5.3 ± 1.0 mGy) and LD studies (2.9 ± 0.6 mGy; both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Despite MSCT providing better overall IQ than the twin robotic X-ray system's CBCT mode, both cone-beam protocols offer very good IQ in most studies and are suitable for clinical ankle imaging. Standard-dose and especially low-dose CBCT studies deliver up to five times less radiation dose than MSCT imaging.