LAUSR

Abstract In this paper, we propose a practical approach for decision-making regarding passive cooling design for buildings in dense urban contexts. For non-cooled buildings under temperate climates, assessment of summer thermal discomfort determines the usual passive cooling design together with fossil energy and GHG savings at earth scale. However, passive cooling techniques for indoor climate can be also valuable for local environment impacts, especially urban heat islands’ mitigation. Lack of simple representative criteria and complexity of simulation outputs constitute a barrier for the development of passive cooling. Based on a study of a generic commercial building, we analyzed several designs with Sankey diagram and we developed two performance indexes. This chart synthesis of complex output data allows a direct comparison of design solutions. This analysis gives hints for better designer understanding of urban climate and building interactions for the studied passive cooling solutions: cool roofing, nocturnal natural ventilation and rooftop PV system as shading device. Our results show that nocturnal natural ventilation is efficient to moderate indoor overheating compared to the "cool roof". In addition, cool roofs reduce anthropogenic heat transferred to urban environment. PV panels as shading device mitigate summer discomfort and produce energy that increase building energy efficiency through the year. We defined two Key Performance Indexes (KPIs) to define cooling potential of both indoor and urban environment. These KPIs obtained for different temperate climates highlight new prospects for the design of efficient urban designs with controlled environmental impacts and decision process of stakeholders.