LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Searching for a nutritional screening tool. The value of an analytical method when staff trained in clinical nutrition is not available.

Photo from wikipedia

INTRODUCTION Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent. Various European resolutions urge to screen and treat DRM. No policy in this regard has yet been developed in Extremadura (Spain). OBJECTIVES To… Click to show full abstract

INTRODUCTION Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent. Various European resolutions urge to screen and treat DRM. No policy in this regard has yet been developed in Extremadura (Spain). OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence of DRM (defined as NRS 2002≥3) using an analytical method (FILNUT), and to compare it with the official rate. RESULTS FILNUT scores≥3 showed values of sensitivity (S) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 82.3% and 72.3% respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between men and women using this tool. FILNUT showed a significantly higher sensitivity for detecting malnutrition in medical - as compared to surgical - diseases when low scores were used. The estimated prevalence of DRM was 21.4%. Prevalence of DRM is much greater than officially reported. CONCLUSIONS FILNUT scores≥3 show high sensitivity and PPV for detecting DRM, and is a good alternative as a nutritional screening tool to detect malnutrition at our center.

Keywords: analytical method; screening tool; tool; value; drm; nutritional screening

Journal Title: Endocrinologia, diabetes y nutricion
Year Published: 2018

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.