LAUSR

Abstract In past earthquakes, low-ductility steel concentrically braced frame (CBF) buildings have been observed to retain reserve capacity after brace fracture. The failure mechanisms and earthquake ground motion-sensitive characteristics of the reserve system of low-ductility CBFs are not understood due to limited dynamic experimental data. In this study, a series of shaking table tests is presented to examine the reserve capacity of a scaled two-bay, three-story, low-ductility CBF model in which a pair of square hollow section braces are arranged in a chevron pattern. The model structure was repeatedly subjected to two unidirectional ground motions with successively increasing magnitudes in a stiff soil site and a soft soil site. The experimental phenomena of elastic response, brace buckling behavior, brace reengagement behavior, reserve system response and collapse state were observed. The braces of the low-ductility CBFs were vulnerable to local buckling under dynamic loads and resulted in a soft story where braces failed, while braces and frames in the other stories had no further damage. The reserve stiffness, rather than energy dissipation or reserve strength, was the most important factor in the collapse-prevention capacity for the reserve system of the tested low-ductility CBF, and the lateral stiffness of the columns was the main source of reserve stiffness. Flexible reserve systems with small lateral stiffness were never significantly excited at their natural periods by hard soil site-specific ground motions, while with such systems, a greater risk of potential collapse appears to be posed due to earthquakes at soft soil sites than at hard soil sites for the test model.