LAUSR

Abstract Introduction Patients’ perceptions regarding the relationship between conventional medicine, naturopathy and other types of medicine (for example homoeopathy or holistic medicine) have not been studied in depth. Methods Patients visiting a general physician or a gynaecologist in two private practices in Germany were asked to complete a survey while waiting for their physician’s appointment. They were asked to rate efficacy, side effects, comprehensiveness, personal preferences and cost effectiveness of various types of medicine (conventional medicine, naturopathy, homeopathy and alternative/holistic medicine). The survey was anonymous. Results A total of 862 patients returned the assessment forms (91% response rate) which were then evaluated. Most patients trusted in conventional medicine, however, patients were also interested in other types of medicine, to some degree. Patients associated naturopathy with homoeopathy and holistic medicine, despite the fact that classical naturopathy can be considered as a part of conventional medicine in Germany and is taught at universities. Furthermore German naturopathic societies have developed a clear association with medical societies of conventional medicine. Conclusions In order to have a common background when communicating with the patient it seems very important to clearly define terms associated with complementary, alternative and integrative medicine. Allowing patients to differentiate between reasonable, integrative approaches according to the definition of the National Center of Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH; USA) on one hand and questionable treatment concepts on the other could facilitate communication between physicians and patients so that patients are able to make better treatment decisions.