LAUSR

Introduction Patients with psychosis are treated in outpatient community clinics during most of their lifetime. Antipsychotic treatments are commonly used in regular clinical practice. However, the non-adherence is one of the main causes of relapses. Long-acting injectables (LAIs) could be a safe option to guarantee the efficacy. Aim and objectives Our purpose is to evaluate the efficacy of the switch to paliperidone palmitate from other oral or LAI antipsychotics, in terms of hospital and emergency admissions. Methods We performed a mirror-image study in an outpatient mental health clinic, comparing patients before and after paliperidone palmitate change over 43 months. Fifty-seven patients were included, most of them (n = 47) were diagnosed with psychotic disorders (82.5%) while 4 were bipolar patients (7%), and the remained patients (n = 6; 10.6%) were classified as behavioral disorders. The following variables were studied before and after the switching: number of admissions, days of stay and emergency visits. Results From those 57 patients, 44 were previously treated with other LAIs, whereas 13 were taking oral antipsychotics. The median age at switch was 49 years (SD = 12.31). The reasons for switching were: inefficacy (26.3%), non-adherence (19.3%), side effects (38.6%), and non-specified (15.8%). We found significant differences between the three main variables: number of admissions (t = 4.59; P ≤ 0.001), days of stay (t = 2.27; P = 0.027) and emergency visits (t = 3.74; P ≤ 0.001). Conclusions Paliperidone palmitate seems to be an effective treatment in order to guarantee the adherence. Our preliminary data show that paliperidone palmitate might reduce the sanitary cost in outpatients.