LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Assisted reproductive technology treatment increases obstetric and neonatal risks over that of the underlying infertility diagnosis.

Photo from wikipedia

OBJECTIVE To determine whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment adds obstetric and neonatal risks over and above that of underlying infertility-related diagnoses. DESIGN Retrospective study of linked ART, birth certificate,… Click to show full abstract

OBJECTIVE To determine whether assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment adds obstetric and neonatal risks over and above that of underlying infertility-related diagnoses. DESIGN Retrospective study of linked ART, birth certificate, hospital discharge data, and outpatient insurance claims data in Massachusetts (2013-2017). SETTING Database. PATIENT(S) Singleton deliveries in women with and without diagnoses of tubal disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), other ovulatory conditions, or endometriosis, identified from the insurance claims and ART data. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) ART and non-ART pregnancy and delivery outcomes were compared with each other and with women with no history of infertility or usage of fertility treatment (fertile group). Generalizing estimating equations with Poisson distribution and exchangeable correlation structure were used to obtain adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S) Infertility-related diagnoses significantly increased the risks of pregnancy hypertension (PCOS: aRR, 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.27), preeclampsia/eclampsia (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02-1.61; PCOS: aRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06-1.43; other ovulatory: aRR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20), gestational diabetes (tubal: aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.50; PCOS: aRR 1.58, 95% CI 1.42-1.75; other ovulatory: aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.12-1.26), and placental problems (tubal aRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.94), as well as low birthweight and prematurity, compared with deliveries from the fertile group. Within each diagnosis, the use of ART consistently increased the risk of placental problems (aRR 1.49-2.86) but varied for other conditions. CONCLUSION(S) Our study demonstrated that compared with the fertile group, risk was elevated in pregnancies and deliveries from women with tubal, PCOS, other ovulatory, and endometriosis diagnoses who did/did not undergo ART treatment. Placental abnormalities were particularly elevated in ART compared to non-ART deliveries having the same diagnosis.

Keywords: infertility; art; treatment; assisted reproductive; reproductive technology; obstetric neonatal

Journal Title: Fertility and sterility
Year Published: 2022

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.