LAUSR.org creates dashboard-style pages of related content for over 1.5 million academic articles. Sign Up to like articles & get recommendations!

Drying methods, carrier materials, and length of storage affect the quality of xylooligosaccharides

Photo by a2eorigins from unsplash

Abstract Four drying methods such as freeze drying, vacuum drying, hot-air drying, and spray drying, with or without carriers (maltodextrin and gum arabic) were applied to evaluate their influence on… Click to show full abstract

Abstract Four drying methods such as freeze drying, vacuum drying, hot-air drying, and spray drying, with or without carriers (maltodextrin and gum arabic) were applied to evaluate their influence on the physicochemical properties, microstructures, and storage stability of the resulting xylooligosaccharides (XOS) products. The glass transition temperature (Tg), freezable water content, water activity, water sorption isotherms, microstructure (characterized by XRD, FT-IR, and SEM), chemical quality, and shelf life were mainly studied. The results showed that freezable water content was negatively correlated with Tg. Tg and monolayer water content (Xm) greatly affect the processability and stability of the XOS product, which had a further impact on the microstructure of the product during the storage. For comprehensive consideration, the freeze-dried product with 32–50% maltodextrin and 6–18% gum arabic has higher Tg and lower Xm, and storage stability are relatively good, which can be used as the best conditions for drying the crude XOS liquid.

Keywords: methods carrier; quality; water; storage; drying methods; water content

Journal Title: Food Hydrocolloids
Year Published: 2019

Link to full text (if available)


Share on Social Media:                               Sign Up to like & get
recommendations!

Related content

More Information              News              Social Media              Video              Recommended



                Click one of the above tabs to view related content.