LAUSR

Abstract Elevated fine sediment transport to streams can negatively affect aquatic ecosystem health, downstream infrastructure, and community water supply. Forest harvesting activities can increase the delivery of fine sediment to streams due to intensified erosion or mass wasting from hillslopes, roads, and stream channels. However, quantifying the effects of forest harvesting on sediment inputs to streams and the effectiveness of current best management practices (BMPs) at mitigating these effects remains a challenge. In this study, we used sediment source fingerprinting techniques to quantify and compare the sources of suspended sediment to a stream draining a recently harvested catchment and a nearby, unharvested reference catchment in the Oregon Coast Range of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. In each stream, we quantified the proportional contributions of suspended sediment from three potential source areas: hillslopes, roads, and streambanks. The primary source of suspended sediment in the harvested catchment was streambank sediment (90.2 ± 3.4%) with lesser amounts of hillslope (7.1 ± 3.1%) and road (3.6 ± 3.6%) sediment. Interestingly, the proportional contributions of suspended sediment in the reference catchment were similar, with the majority from streambanks (93.1 ± 1.8%) followed by hillslopes (6.9 ± 1.8%). There were no contributions from roads in the reference catchment, despite a similar road network as the harvested catchment. We also quantified monthly sediment mass eroded from 36 × 1 m2 hillslope plots. The sediment mass eroded from the general harvest area (96.5 ± 57.0 (SE) g) was ~10.6-times greater than the sediment collected in the riparian buffer (9.1 ± 1.9 g) and ~4.6-times greater than the sediment collected on the unharvested, reference hillslope (21.0 ± 3.3 g). While this study provides evidence of effectiveness of contemporary BMPs (e.g., riparian management areas, limits to cutblock size, reduced impact forest harvesting techniques, road building and maintenance) at mitigating sediment delivery to streams, additional research is needed as existing studies do not adequately reflect the broad range of climate, geology, topography, and vegetation in the Pacific Northwest, which drive highly variable hydrologic and geomorphic processes in the region.