This work treats writing inks, particularly ballpoint pen inks. It reviews those ink aging methods that are based on the analysis (measurement) of ink solvents (e.g., 2-phenoxyethanol, which is the… Click to show full abstract
This work treats writing inks, particularly ballpoint pen inks. It reviews those ink aging methods that are based on the analysis (measurement) of ink solvents (e.g., 2-phenoxyethanol, which is the most common among ballpoint pen inks). Each method involves measurements that are components of an ink aging parameter associated with the method. Only mass independent parameters are considered. An ink solvent from an ink that is on an air-exposed substrate will evaporate at a decreasing rate and is never constant as the ink ages. An ink aging parameter should reflect this behavior. That is, the graph of a parameter's experimentally-determined values plotted against ink age (which yields the ink aging curve) should show this behavior. However, some experimentally-determined aging curves contain outlying points that are below or above where they should be or points corresponding to different ages that have the same ordinate (parameter value). Such curves, unfortunately, are useless since such curves show that an ink can appear older or younger than what it should be in one or more of its points or have the same age in two or more of its points. This work explains that one cause of this unexpected behavior is that the parameter values were improperly determined such as when a measurement is made of an ink solvent that is not completely extracted (removed) from an ink sample with a chosen extractor such as dry heat or a solvent.
               
Click one of the above tabs to view related content.