LAUSR

Abstract Downwearing rates (erosion in the vertical plane) were measured with a micro-erosion meter (MEM) in eastern Canada, on an argillacious, sub-horizontal shore platform at Mont Louis in eastern Quebec, and on two sloping, basaltic and sandstone platforms at, respectively, Scots Bay and Burntcoat Head in the Bay of Fundy, Nova Scotia. The original data covered a period from 2002 to 2009. This dataset was extended by measurements repeated at surviving MEM stations in 2017, producing records ranging over 9–14 years, depending on when each station was installed. Because of rapid surface downwearing, many of the original MEM stations were inoperable in 2017, especially at Burntcoat Head. Nevertheless, data were obtained from 19 stations at Burntcoat (35% of the 2009 original), 25 at Mont Louis (83% of the original), and 38 at Scots Bay (75% of the original). For the stations at Mont Louis and Scots Bay that were still functioning in 2017, there were no significant differences in rates of downwearing over the shorter (from station installation up to 2009) and extended periods (from installation to 2017). Mean rates of downwearing calculated from all the stations in each area declined through time, however, due to the loss of the more rapidly eroding stations. A simple procedure, which was proposed to compensate for this decrease, produced mean downwearing rates that were broadly similar to those reported over the original measurement period. There were significant relationships between downwearing rates and elevation (R2 = 0.32) and downwearing rates and rock hardness (R2 = 0.41) in the extended record at Scots Bay, and a small but significant relationship between downwearing rates and rock hardness at Mont Louis (R2 = 0.17). Differences in downwearing rates across the platforms suggest that salt weathering and wetting and drying are dominant weathering mechanisms at Scots Bay and Mont Louis. Chemical weathering of the sandstone cementing agent and the premature removal of weathered grains by wave-generated bottom currents may, however, be more important at Burntcoat Head.